is an online archive of some of my more substantial articles and reviews.
For daily updates, please follow my blog:

Matthew Bourne’s Swan Lake just wrapped the Melbourne leg wing of its international tour, and it was everything I expected and so, so much more.

The Swan / Stranger – Jonathan Ollivier and Christopher Trenfield
The Prince – Christopher Marney and Simon Williams
The Queen – Anjali Mehra and Stephanie Billers
The Girlfriend – Carrie Johnson and Anjali Mehra

Matthew Bourne’s New Adventure
Swan Lake on Tour
Matthew Bourne’s New Adventures Facebook
Helen Maybanks photography

Jonathan Olivier in rehearsal.
There have been many modern re-interpretations of classical ballets, but Bourne offers the most well-known and celebrated reworking. This ballet has collected numerous accolades and earned world-wide recognition. Books have been written about it and it’s even part of the GCSE and A Level syllabus (British kids study it in school). It’s recognised as a modern classic.

I’ve seen the original 1995 recording of the ballet countless times and have fallen in love with every aspect of it. Last week, after years of waiting, I finally managed to see my favourite ballet live. Twice. Here, I present to you a rambling recounting of my experience, but I am not going to describe the plot – I feel that the story of this ballet and its origins deserves a separate post.
Chris Trenfield
For the uninitiated, what you need to know is this: in the mid 1990s Matthew Bourne, a British choreographer, bravely decided to re-work Swan Lake, the crowning jewel of classical ballet, with an all-male cast. The result has often been called “the gay version” of Swan Lake (I want to slap any person using this term).

While it’s true that the dynamic of the story has changed significantly along with the cast, Bourne’s version of the ballet offers a remarkably complex psychological alternative to the classic.

At least that’s my reading. Feel free to disagree in the comments.
Matthew Boune's Swan Lake. Photo by Helen Maybanks.
Overall impressions

I was fortunate enough to see two performances, on Sunday the 19th and the matinee on Saturday the 25th. I didn’t intend to watch two shows (the tickets are pricy), but as I left the theatre on the 19th it dawned on me that I simply had to experience the show one more time.

Seeing the show twice allowed me to focus on the details I missed during the first performance. Bourne packs a lot of action into 2 hours, and it’s hard to take it all in in a single viewing. There are no lulls in the story, no melodramatic asides, and the pace doesn’t let up at all, with a gear change in Act 3, as the story rushes towards its conclusion.

Bourne has said in recent interviews that he’s had a chance to review and “tighten” the story, as well as the choreography. He toned down the humour and got rid of some of the red herrings in the plot. These changes are small but noticeable. The entire production is tight and razor sharp.

Matthew Bourne's Swan Lake. Jonathan Olivier and Chris Trenfield.
The Swan / Stranger

Performed by Jonathan Ollivier (left) and Christopher Trenfield (right).

When the Swan steps on to the stage in Act 2, you can feel a subtle change in the atmosphere, and you know you are about to witness something remarkable. The story may be about the Prince (he hardly ever leaves the stage), but it ultimately belongs to the Swan.

Trenfield commanded the stage completely. He has a uncanny way of drawing focus to the tiniest of his movements, like a flick of a wrist. As he raised an arm, I found myself focusing on his fingers, when he extended a leg, all my attention went to the tips of his toes. As the Swan, he was a magnificent, powerful and – in Act 4 – vulnerable creature, capable both of great violence and tenderness.
Chris Trenfield as the Swan in Act 4
There was one moment I particularly liked. As the Swan and the Prince come into contact for the first time, the Swan standing in a dignified arabesque and the prince gingerly supporting him, Trenfield moved his had slowly in an arch from left to right, pausing on the audience for a moment before moving his head sharply towards the prince. The effect was very crisp and bird-like.

The Stranger was every bit as tantalising and cruel as one would expect (despite the fact that in the second performance Trenfield seemingly missed his cue, and his entrance was a little rushed). I feel sorry for anyone sharing the stage with him.

This Black Swan figure draws your attention so completely, that you follow him even when he is on the periphery of a scene.

I ended up missing some of the action the first time around because I was focusing so hard on the Stranger. During the second show I made an effort to concentrate on centre stage, but my eyes kept straying to Trenfield stalking his way around the room.
Matthew Bourne's Swan Lake. Chris Marney and Simon Williams.
The Prince

Performed by Christopher Marney (left) and Simon Williams (right).

I’m not sure at what point Bourne cut a younger version of the prince from the story (in the original production the prince was played by a young boy at the start of Act 1 and at the very end of Act 4), but this is the only change I wish he hadn’t made. Having the child prince lead us into (and out of) the story reinforced the innocence of this character, as well as the coldness of his mother and the nightmarish nature of the swan vision. The poignancy gets a little lost, and the prince of the current production appears pathetic and needy.

I found myself missing Scott Ambler’s prince, so regal and dignified despite his mental anguish.

All that being said, Williams delivered a powerful and heartfelt performance on both nights. He played the role to the hilt. The madness scenes were very convincing and heartbreaking.
Matthew Bourne's Swan Lake. Anjali Mehra and Stephanie Billers.
The Queen

Performed by Stephanie Billers (left) and Anjali Mehra (right).

The Queen is a tricky character. There’s no denying the somewhat Oedipal nature of her relationship with the prince. She appears cold and even monstrous for the duration of the story, incapable of showing any affection to her struggling son. Yet I’m not ready to cast her as a villain. It takes more than one viewing for her complexities to become evident, and a lot depends on the dancer portraying her (I find Anjali Mehra’s Queen colder and more distant than Stephanie Billers’).

While her grief at his death at the end of the ballet is genuine and raw, I find the scene at the start of Act 4, when The Queen sees her son alive for the last time and reaches out to him but stops herself at the last moment, especially telling. This is a woman who understands the restrictions of the world she lives in. Monarchy demands for all emotion to be suppressed for the sake of propriety. She struggles to impart this skill to her son. But she doesn’t stop trying.

One mustn’t forget that this ballet was created at the height of the Diana / Charles / Camilla saga, and the royal family were in the news daily. So much for dignity and propriety.

The Corps

Bourne’s corps de ballet arguably have a harder job than the corps of the original Swan Lake, as they inhabit so many different characters in the story: the palace guard and servants, the photographers, the fans and autograph hunters, the patrons of the seedy nightclub, the swans, the dancers of the spoof “ballet within a ballet”, and the guests at the royal ball. The men are magnificent, but the company also boasts some remarkable women. The glittering princesses and the tipsy flirts add colour, warmth and feisty energy to this glum world.
But the main draw, of course, are the swans. This version of Swan Lake isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, but even the most critical viewer will concede that Bourne’s swans are mesmerising.

Replacing female swans with male dancers makes a lot of sense when you think about it – swans are territorial, often aggressive animals, with a huge wing-span and powerful physique.

Anyone who’s ever come across these creatures in real life would know that they are no delicate maidens. Bourne’s swans hiss, spit and bite. They are forceful and intimidating, but possess a certain graceful lustre. They can also be serene and playful. I find the Dance of the Cygnets especially delightful – Bourne’s Swans really look and act like teenagers.
Matthew Boune's Swan Lake. Photo by Helen Maybanks.

4 Reasons I’m Mad at Regent Theatre

I have to say, I’m massively disappointed with the venue. Here’s why.

1. There was no cast sheet of any kind available, and you didn’t know who you were going to see until the curtain went up. As a result, I ended up seeing the same cast twice (Trenfield and Williams), and I was really hoping to see both them and Ollivier and Marney.

2. The staff let people in 30 minutes after the performance had started. On both nights I was there. You really need to draw the line somewhere.

3. Buying tickets for the second night became a bit of a nightmare. There is some ridiculous rule that doesn’t allow you to buy a single ticket anywhere near an aisle if there are 2 empty seats next to you. I can’t even explain it. Booking a seat turned into a game of tetris and I ended up in a pretty shabby spot even though better seats were available and I was willing to pay extra.

4. The seats are all on the same level. Which means that is you are short like me and someone slightly taller than you seats in front, your view of the stage is completely blocked. This happened on both nights.


Follow the Flock

The Swan Lake tour is currently in Sydney, and will in a week’s time make its way to Milan. I recommend following these dancers on Instagram if you are interested in the company’s progress and day-to-day activities.

Chris Marney
Chris Trenfield
Anjali Mehra

3 thoughts on “ Matthew Bourne’s Swan Lake in Melbourne ”

  1. I think the role of the young prince was removed for the international tour for the logistical reasons. Tough to have a kid to travel on his own with a company of adults for a year. I agree that the removal of this role changed our perception of the prince for those who hasnt seen it before. I am glad I wasnt the only one who went to see it twice. It gave me a chance to appreciate it even more. I however found it a blessing to not have gotten the best seats the second time round. I sat in the first balcony second round at the right corner and got a different perspective of the movements. I also like the fact the fact that MB’s productions gives each member of the corps de ballet a chance to shine in the various scenes dedicated to them ie the various swans and the ballroom scenes. Having read MB’s notes provided in the program, I better understood why this SL is so capitivating. MB made the comment that to be touched by this ballet, the prince must break your heart. Simon Williams practically smashes your hearts to bits in his performance moving from innocence and vulnerability, to joy and happines at finding his kindred spirit as he encounters and dances with the swans (This is lost with the removal of scene of the young prince with his security blanket – the toy swan) and then finally to bewilderment and madness as he cannot differentiate reality between the Sawn/Stranger which lead to his breakdown/death. The swan/stranger role in my opinion will also define the final experience of the audience and having seen this live and in the 2 DVD versions. It is amazing the difference in nuances each lead/swan brings to the performance. Christopher Trenfield was distinct and convincing as a “real” Swan (not a person playing the swan) and the stranger. These were 2 distinct and separate roles with only the Prince confusing these 2 roles as 1 entity. The role of the girlfriend is also significant to me because she determines the tone/impact for the depth of betrayal as the prince realises he has no one. It’s not easy to portray the role of the comedic dumb blonde with a dark agenda and Anjali delivered this in spades. All said and done, I hope you get a chance to catch MB’s The Car Men in London next year because this is the one where no one plays a prince/princess.


    1. Hi Geran,

      Thanks for your comment! I completely agree with everything you’re saying (except I thought that in this version the Girlfriend was more of an innocent bystander whom the Private Secretary tried to pay off so she would disappear. She refused, but the prince saw her take the money and though she betrayed him. In the original version the Secretary and the Girlfriend were more obviously in cahoots). I actually regret not writing about the Girlfriend in this review. I though she was a marvellous character, beautifully played by both dancers. It would’ve been so easy to make her a silly, fake blonde, but she’s got real warmth and humour.

      Couldn’t agree more about the corps. Each member had their moment in the spotlight, and it was wonderful. And Trenfield’s Stranger really did appear like an innocent gatecrasher, who was there to have a bit of fun and ended up wrestling with a crazed prince. This only made the Prince’s madness all the more evident.

      I don’t think I’ll be in London next year 😦 But I definitely want to see more MB shows, so I now have an incentive to travel!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s